The rise of
Ron Paul during this 2008 presidential primary season has been a fascinating phenomenon to watch. As someone who believes in small government, there obviously are moments when I find myself in agreement with his positions and views. He is more of a "Libertarian" than a typical "Republican" -- indeed, a couple of decades ago he ran for president on the Libertarian Party ticket.
That said, I don't support Ron Paul for president. I don't support him for many of the same reasons I don't call myself a "libertarian": that word is both too vague and generally represents a position that starts at the political level --rather than more fundamental philosophical levels. And then not surprisingly, I disagree with the views of "libertarians" on many specific and important issues of the day (while agreeing on a superficial level on some issues).
My friend Shawn Klein has
summarized why he doesn't support Ron Paul, on an issue-by-issue basis, drawing on Paul's own campaign website. See also his
followup to clarifiy non-interventionism points, I generally agree with Shawn's assessments. Apparently, since he wrote that post, the Paul site has been changed and now lists 16 issues, so I hope that Shawn can offer his views on the new ones sometime. If I find time and inclination, I might take a closer look at the current "isseus" section at Paul's site and comment as well.
For now, as an aside, I'll note that I find it particularly odd that the 16 issues include what I would generally consider "big issues" -- except one of them is "No taxes on tips", which is about exactly what it sounds like, the position that "tips" such as waitressing tips should not be taxed. I agree with Paul on that, but is that really worth mentioning on the same level as "Education" and "Health Care"? Obviously not. I wonder if the webmaster for the Paul campaign works as a waiter/waitress in his/her spare time, and got this issue inserted as part of their pay for work on the site? LOL
Robert Bidinotto has also done some good blogging on the Paul candidacy, focused mostly on the foreign policy area. Check out his post
Ron Paul's "non-interventionism" fraud. And then the magazine Robert is the editor of,
The New Individualist, has a cover story about Ron Paul (here is Robert's
blog post about this issue of the magazine, with provacative cover scan).
Labels: us_gov_politics