What Would John Galt Do?
Wow... this is impressive. My friend Shawn Klein blogged about Ezra Levant's defense of free speech before the Canadian "Human Rights" Commission. I must agree with Shawn that it amounts to a "remarkable and inspiring demonstration."
In fact, it made me think of the heroes and heroines of Ayn Rand's novels (especially Atlas Shrugged). I could just see Ezra, faced with a summons before the HRC, asking himself "What would John Galt do?" (as a play on the cliche "What would Jesus do?")
The issue here is Ezra's publishing of the "Danish Muhammad" cartoons that raised such a fuss a while back. Complaints have been lodged, and so he has been summoned by the HRC to be interogated about this. A clear freedom of speech issue, pure and simple.
You can watch the video at Shawn's blog above, or you can see it at YouTube here. This is his 6:31 "opening statement". It is great that this was video-taped, and that it is available on YouTube -- I don't know if that is standard HRC policy to make the video-taping available to the person being questioned, or if this was a leak -- but either way, it is great we can all see it.
Then be sure to also see the other segments that follow, which are shorter (see the links in the Related Videos scroll window at YouTube). While being asked seemingly standard questions, he doesn't waver in his defense -- though at times he resorts to some mild ad hominem against those bringing the charges against him, and a few other people (e.g, calling some people "fools" and so on). I wish he hadn't done that... but it is the only thing that keeps his performance from being a perfect 10.0. If this were the Olympics, as a judge I'd be holding up a card with "9.8" on it or something thereabouts.
One other thing... I don't know who the woman is interrogating/interviewing him. At a few moments I felt sorry for her -- just doing a job, but clearly outmatched by the intellectual ammunition and preparation of Ezra. I give her credit for not getting emotional or engaging him in debate -- a battle she would clearly have lost. But that is all I give her credit for -- as this entire event should never have occurred in the first place, and it seems, the HRC -- if it ever had a legitimate purpose -- clearly is overstepping those bounds today.
Labels: individual_rights

