Who Should I Be Following?
When stated like that, "Who Should I Be Following?" doesn't sound so good. What I mean is... on Twitter, what people should I add to the list that "follow"?
I've not blogged here at Philosopher Stone about my use of Twitter. I started late last year, right about the time that apparently Twitter's growth really started to skyrocket.
I get a lot of value from Twitter, especially professionally as I follow several dozen people who are in the Learning and Development field (sometimes called "Training and Development" or other similar names). I've listed some of these people at this posting at the Element K Blog (I'm the company blogger). The list is not complete, since I've added many others from the industry since then, but that gives you a sense of it.
But what about gurus, experts, smart people, technophile geeks, etc., who are not in the L&D field? I follow some people who specialize in different areas, and I get value from them too. But I'm sure there are many interesting people that I could add, and that I'm just not aware use Twitter. Here are the folks of this type that I already follow (in no particular order):
- davewiner / Dave Winer
- LanceUlanoff / Lance Ulanoff
- rohitbhargava / Rohit Bhargava
- ginatrapani / Gina Trapani
- Lifehacker
- thurrott / Paul Thurrott
- gtdguy / David Allen
- Scobleizer / Robert Scoble
- jimmy_wales / Jimmy Wales
Labels: Twitter

1 Comments:
As with other kinds of networking, I think it's both good and challenging to connect with people outside your field.
I found a list of 18 people to follow "for a real-time education." They're "professors" in Lon Cohen's terms because he can learn from them.
A wide range of interests there, with social media usually included. I decided to add four for now, and have stuck with three of them.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home