On Parental Rights and Homeschooling in California
Thomas Bowden at the blog Principles in Practice posted "California Children Still Considered State Property" in response to a recent legal decision on homeschooling and parental rights in California. He argues that the court decision didn't go nearly far enough to truly establish parental rights of child education. A good article, he concludes by rightly asking the bigger questions:
But what if parents stopped groveling and started asking whether the state has any right at all to be running schools, dictating educational standards for children, and “permitting” parents to homeschool their own kids? This would call into question the moral foundation of public education as such.
But I especially liked the following paragraph, which draws a great analogy:
Education, like nutrition, should be recognized as the exclusive domain of a child’s parents, within legal limits objectively defining child abuse and neglect. Parents who starve their children may properly be ordered to fulfill their parental obligations, on pain of losing legal custody. But the fact that some parents may serve better food than others does not permit government to seize control of nutrition, outlaw home-cooked meals, and order all children to report for daily force-feeding at government-licensed cafeterias.
That is a great analogy. I especially like "outlaw home-cooked meals", which is a direct reductio ad absurdem of any attempt to outlaw homeschooling.
Labels: education_k-12, individual_rights

